Socializing San Francisco’s Healthcare Industry

            San Francisco is attempting to follow the through with a socialized form of healthcare just as Massachusetts, Maryland, and Suffolk County of New York have been attempting. San Francisco has placed the burden of health insurance on the businesses of the city. The new law requires businesses to pay into health insurance depending on the amount of workers they employ. In San Francisco, 73,000 people are living without health insurance; half of those are currently working. The goal of the plan is to expand health insurance coverage by placing the responsibility on the businesses to fund it. While some of the businesses are covering the cost of health insurance, others are passing this cost onto the consumer. In some restaurants, the customer is being charged a “health insurance fee” to cover San Francisco’s new law.

            A restaurant group advocate took the new bill to court and won in the initial appeals. The law will be further examined in a higher court. But for now, many business owners are passing the responsibility to the consumer, claiming that the new bill is cutting into the company’s profits. Other business owners are concerned about the amount of employees they employ as the new Bill classifies employers into specific groups based on the amount of workers they employ. For a company employing just fewer than 100 workers, they will be reluctant to higher new workers and grow the business to refrain from moving into a larger size bracket. 

            Although many business owners are against the bill, 18,000 have been insured since it began. Many employees who receive a policy through a group health insurance plan claim they never would have sought a plan on their own, but with the new Bill set in place, they are able to obtain a plan through their employer without searching on their own. Regardless of the laws set in place, many people are not even interested in obtaining health insurance. One local business owner offered health insurance to 45 employees and only received feedback from less than 5%. The laws set in place differ from Massachusetts as they do not require citizens to obtain health insurance, only that employers pay for it.

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this entry.
Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.